2015年11月15日托福独立写作范文：The more money people have, the more money they should give away to charity

2015年11月15日托福独立写作范文：The more money people have, the more money they should give away to charity.

托福写作解题思路：

应该给

1.能帮助别人

a.帮助学生：这些捐款可以帮助没有钱的学生上大学、买书籍和文具，帮助他们完成学业

b.帮助没有工作的人：这些捐款可以帮助失业者解决温饱和住宿问题，帮助他们度过难关

2.对捐赠者他们自己有好处

a.很开心：赠人玫瑰，手留余香，看见得到帮助的人有了更好的发展，自己会获得成就感，内心会更开心，更幸福

b.获得荣誉：乐于帮助别人，会给自己带来更好的声誉，更受大家的喜爱

托福独立写作范文-名师版：

The popularity of technology widens the gap between the rich and the poor to some extent. In order to bridge the gap between them, many people suggest that it is reasonable to require the well-paid people, especially those who are wealthy, to donate money to the poor. However, as far as i am concerned, this practice is far away from being justified for the following two reasons.

First and foremost, demanding the better-off to give away more to the charity is likely to discourage the initiative of them. The willingness of people to be devoted to helping others is the key to philanthropy. If the willingness gradually decreases, hardly can the charitable institution be supported and exist. Since the wealthy earn their fortune by prodigious efforts, they are entitled to allocate their own income.

If they are compelled to act according to the claim, they are inclined to pay less effort to making money, along with which their wills to devote money may decline. Therefore, fewer funds can be raised to help the poor. In some extreme cases, the affluent may understate their fortune in order to shirk the heavy demand for donation, like what they have done to evade taxation.

。。。。。。。此处省略部分范文!

托福独立写作名师范文：

Money is what makes the world go round, they say, but that is only true if you have it. The suggestion that people who have more money ought to give more to charity just makes sense to most; however, I think the rich should not have to part with their hardly earned cash.

In the first place, they should spend it on art. Creating a moral code that compels the rich to pour their money down the bottomless rat-hole of charitable causes will diminish investment in culture, the lasting legacy of any civilization. Take Bill & Melinda Posterns, along with their friend Warren Pummel, for example. They are reputedly the three most “generous” philanthropists in the world, but the 40 billion dollar endowment of their foundation is a drop in the bucket compared to what is needed to alleviate hunger, malaria, AIDS, and malnutrition. If they had spent their money on art, they could have bought 40 museums with better collections than the Detroit Institute of Arts. Imagine that!

。。。。。。。此处省略部分范文！

完整版范文，5元有偿下载！