2015年4月12日托福独立写作范文：Internet is as important as other service such as building roads that government

2015年4月12日托福独立写作范文：Internet is as important as other service such as building roads that government should make Internet access to all the citizens at no cost. 互联网与修建公路一样重要，政府应该让所有的公民免费获取互联网服务

托福写作思路：

应该提供免费的网络

1.对职业生活好

a.找工作方便：有了免费网络，任何人都可以借助它来找工作，从而给经济上有困难的人带来了更多工作机会

b.利于晋升：借助免费网络，人们可以随时随地地处理工作任务，而无需担心被收取额外的费用，提高了工作效率，任务完成好，有助于晋升

2.对日常生活好

a.维系友谊：有了免费网络，人们会更愿意花时间联系朋友，互相倾诉和帮助，从而巩固了友谊

b.心理健康好：网络费用不再成为人们的支出负担，使用网络时心情更加舒畅，每天会更开心，这样对心理健康好

托福独立写作范文一：

赞同观点：

With the advent of information age, the Internet has profoundly influenced every aspect in modern people’s life. Under such a background, how does the government play its role? Should the government offer Internet access to citizens at no cost? These questions trigger a heated debate in society. From my perspective, the Internet access, like other important public services, is supposed to be available to the public free of charge. I am going to elaborate my viewpoint in the following paragraphs. (80 words)

Firstly,charge-free strategy allows more people to enjoy internet-based public services. Under the encouragement of cost-free policy, an increasingly number of people are willing to get access to the Internet and then benefit from government services optimized by the Internet. For example, in my country, people used to have real difficulty in buying train tickets especially during holiday seasons. In order to successfully buy the tickets, they had to wait in line in poorly ventilated place for hours. But now, things have changed a lot. They book tickets online very quickly and use their ID card to check in at the train station.

。。。。。。。此处省略部分范文!

托福写作范文二：

Despite the huge impact of the Internet, as a convenient tool for educational, vocational and recreational purposes, offering free Internet access should be viewed as a short-sighted, ill-considered proposal. For both personal and commercial concerns, Internet with no charges will inevitably bring about unexpected fallout. Therefore, I hold my point that under no circumstances should the government provide free Internet access for the public.

First, for the users of Internet, free of charge means declination of quality. So limited is the total bandwidth of Internet access, that more computers and phones connected to the Internet means slower speed for each individual user. Now, as Internet could be available only after payment, those unwilling to spend money on the Internet leaves fairly enough bandwidth for the registered users. However, were Internet free of charge for citizens, almost everyone, whether with urgent or irrelevant aims, would have connected to the Internet for 24 hours 7 days. Then, without doubt, so many citizens watching online videos, downloading large-scale softwares or chatting via video cam with more than 10 friends, the Internet must be slower than those using a primitive 14.4k modem. So, for the rights to access fast enough Internet, government should never make it free.

。。。。。。。此处省略部分范文!

完整版范文，5元有偿下载!